A Sermon Based Upon Genesis 17: 1-7;
15-16, NRSV
By Rev. Dr. Charles J. Tomlin, DMin
Flat Rock-Zion Baptist Partnership
February 18th, 2018
One of William Shakespeare’s most famous
quotes has Juliet asking Romeo: "What's
in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” Juliet’s point was that it didn’t matter what
Romeo’s family name was because they loved each other.
So, what is in a name? When I started college I made a little fun
with my name. While introducing myself,
I say something like, “I’m Charles Tomlin
from a little village called ‘Charles’ and I grew up on a road named ‘Tomlin’. With tongue in cheek I added: “My parents weren’t real creative.” Of course, I was only joking. Actually, I was named “Charles” after my
father. My middle name is Joseph, but my
nickname is “Joey”. The reason they
didn’t call me Joseph or Joe was because “Joey” was the name I already had when
my parents adopted me at nine months. Sometimes
there’s a lot that can be said with a name.
In our text today, Abram got his new
name: “Abraham.” As Abraham journeyed
with God, he lived by the promise that he would give birth to a great people. Today three major religions of Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam, go back to this “Abraham”. We connect to Abraham through his most
famous three sons; Isaac, Ishmael, and of course, Jesus who was born of
‘Abraham’s seed’ (Matt. 1:1). What is
most important, however, is not any kind of genealogical connection, but the
spiritual connection we can have. So, first,
before we get to how Abram became Abraham, let’s review the most important
spiritual details of this story.
I
AM GOD, ALMIGHTY
This story of renaming begins, not with
the renaming of Abraham, but with God making his own name crystal clear. Perhaps, since Abram was 99 years old, he
needed a reminder. I already need a lot
of reminding at this dear age of “60”. But
this is probably less about Abram’s need to be reminded, as much as, it is about
God’s desire to reveal himself. At the center
of this story is one of the greatest of spiritual truths ever encountered: We can’t fully know who we are, or what life
means, without knowing this God whom we call ‘the one true God.’ “I am the Almighty God…” literally means,
“I am the God of the Mountain top”,
or as we might translate it: I’m at the
top of everything you imagine to be God.
For you see, Abram did not come from a
land that was devoid of God, but he came from a land of many gods, many forms
of worship, and many different religious understandings. It was out of this ‘many’ that this one ‘Almighty God’ revealed himself. This revelation did not come through a mere idea,
but through a specific people who were called to live, to believe, trust, and to
follow the promise of this God who would bless them, and by blessing them, would
bless the whole world. This isn’t a
‘bad’ vision of God, is it? In a time
when many people today have become afraid of religion, thinking of religious faith
as a negative, harmful or meaningless, what if we could recapture this ‘vision’
or ‘revealing’ a God who blesses?
Again, Abram came out of a world where
there were many gods: temple gods, national gods, local community gods, and
household gods. Hardly anyone in that
day would have dared suggested that there wasn’t a god. There was, on the contrary, a god for just
about any occasion. Giving a mind, soul,
or personal name to nature or other unseen powers was the way that ancient
people made meaning for their lives.
They believed that appeasing and pleasing these gods would help to
control their own destiny. Today, few
would name all these invisible powers ‘gods’, but we name them mother nature, random
situations, or specific circumstances. And
even though some ‘circumstances’ seem to have a mind of their own, fewer people
today think they need an understanding of many gods or any God, for that
matter. While the Hebrew Psalmist wrote
that “Only a fool says in his or her
heart, there’s no God (Psa. 14:1, 53:1, Luk. 12:20),” the direction of most people’s thinking today
is exactly the opposite, “Only fools still
say there is an “Almighty God.”
The popular Welsh philosopher of the
last century, Bertrand Russell explained how modern people shouldn’t base their
lives on a “God who can’t be proven”. This
was is the evolving, advancing norm for thinking people, since the European
Enlightenment. And Russell and the
Enlightenment thinkers are right: The Bible never once tried to prove the
existence of God. It does not prove God,
but assumes God. The problem today is
not that God has been disproven, but that belief in God is being ‘discarded’ or
‘displaced’ by people with either money of power. But even this decline of
faith in God, the basic questions of life still remain ultimately unanswerable without
faith.
The most specific question that still remains
is: “Do people live better and die better
by the facts, or do people live better and die better when they they have
‘hope’ beyond the ‘facts’? Interestingly,
when a woman in Great Britain heard this philosopher explain that she shouldn’t
believe a God who wasn’t provable, she decided to keep going to church to
worship God anyway as an ‘act’ of her faith.
And the woman was right to do so.
Most philosophers today admit they don’t really live just by the facts
either. Since God can’t be proven or
disproven, you simply express a specific kind of ‘faith’ when you say that
there is no God. For just as Abraham
followed God by faith (Hebrews 11: 8ff), not by sight, so we who choose to have
faith, we follow in Abraham’s footsteps.
The real question in our lives is not will I have faith or not, but which
kind of faith will we have? Will my
faith include the revealed faith, or will my kind of ‘faith’ exclude the revealed
faith with a hope that replaces God.
This is why the Biblical question is not, do you believe, but which God
will you serve, God, or Money? Whether you admit it or not, you will still
have a god. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherhowse/7956590/Bertrand-Russell-versus-faith-in-God.html).
Several years ago, in 2001, I flew to
Boston, Massachusetts twice, to interview for a position as pastor of a Baptist
Church in one of the nearby suburbs. Interestingly,
I flew in and out of Logan Airport, the same Airport terrorist flew out of, only
four months later. One day, during my
visit, I went into a local book store and came across a book written by local
Harvard Professor of Psychiatry, Armand Nicoli.
For thirty-five years, Dr. Nicoli had taught the most popular class at
Harvard. This book was based on those
lectures entitled, “The Question of God”. Public Television had made a Documentary
about the contents of the book. The
class lectures were based on arguments of the Oxford professor, C.S. Lewis who
converted from atheism to Christianity, compared to the arguments of the
Austrian Sigmund Freud, a Jew who became an atheist, who is thought of as the
founder of modern psychology. If you
have any ‘questions’ about God, you ought to read that book, or check out the
documentary. Without making one single
argument, and without making one single conclusion, by the time you finish that
book, you’ll understand a great distinction between a life lived by a person of
faith moving toward God, verses someone running away from having faith in God. What
is that distinction? (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/).
WALK
BEFORE ME….BE BLAMELESS
Perhaps the greatest distinction between
a faithful and faithless person, is whether or not they actually live their
lives based on the moral command of this ‘Almighty
God’. This is exactly what it meant
for Abram to become Abraham; the father of all revealed faith. Abram was never given any kind of
explanation, proof, or theory about God, but he was ‘commanded’ to live a higher
standard of morality by this God.
I don’t want to get into a deep
discussion about proving God, but I do think it is important to understand,
that what we see happening in this moral command that is being placed upon
Abram, ‘to walk….and be blameless’,
is precisely what C.S. Lewis wrote about in his greatest writing, Mere Christianity. Lewis said that: “The human “conscience
reveals to us a moral law whose source cannot be found in the natural world,
thus pointing to a supernatural Lawgiver. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_morality). The point is, where does our sense of ‘ought’ come
from? Does it only come from ourselves, or
does it come from the God who created us, and commands us to live before
him? I realize that there are many who
would argue that human morality is merely evolutionary; that morality is simply
a way that humans try to protect themselves.
But how can loving your enemy protect you? How can turning the other cheek, protect
you? How can giving your life for
another person, protect you? There are
so many ways that human wish or will does not explain the high moral potential
of the human person. Personally, I think
that the greatest moral sense is as a result of nothing less than the command
and call of God. That’s exactly how it
came to Abraham, and it is still the highest calling ever placed upon humanity
is to rise above ourselves and to live the command of God.
And this is exactly what frightens many
non-religious people today. Many see
religious faith as being very dangerous, because it is not based on logic, on
mere reason, or on the facts or good that can be proven. When a suicide bomber blows up innocent
people, many of them are also claiming, not only a connection back to Abraham,
but they are saying that they have been ‘commanded’ by God to ‘walk before him’
and ‘to be blameless’. But to be
‘blameless’ as they interpret it, is to do what God says, no matter who gets
hurt.
While we can agree that religious faith
can be dangerous; so can natural gas, fire, water, wind and too much air. Anything in this world can be abused, and
the greatest abuse of true religious faith is to miss the main point of ‘why’
Abram was called to ‘walk before God and
be blameless’; Abraham was to be blessed to be a blessing. When we make religion only our own private
pipeline to God we’ve missed the main point of what faith in God is all
about. Faith isn’t merely about being
faithful to God or responding in faith in God on our own account, but faith in
God is both a call and command to ‘walk
before God’ so we can ‘walk with
others’. As one Old Testament
Scholar, Terence Fretheim has said, “This
God who calls Abraham is a missionary God.”
This God of the Hebrews is the God who not only commands that the
children of Abraham follow and love him, but he is the true God who calls and
commands Abraham to by a standard of morality that enables him to bless others.
(See Genesis, NIB, Abingdon Press, 1994, pp
457-461).
What we see in Abraham’s life; is not a
perfect, sinless person, but he is a very moral person. He gave his nephew Lot the first choice of
the best land so there would be no scabble (Gen. 13:8ff). When Lot was later kidnapped, Abraham got a
small army together to rescue him (Gen.
14:12ff). After the battle was over, Abraham
refused to get rich from the battle.
Instead, Abraham gave thanks by worshipping ‘the most High God’ and paying
a tithe (a tenth of all he had) to the very mysterious priest, Melchizedek (Gen. 14:16ff). And even when God decided to destroy Sodom
and Gomorrah for its degradation into sin, it was Abraham who tried to talk God
out of it (Gen 18:17ff). Whatever you
want to say about Abraham, you must say that Abraham is depicted as someone
answering the command to a higher moral life—a kind life that is blessed to be
a blessing.
People
whose lives are bound to God, can have an inner strength that ties loose ends of
hearts and minds together. This idea comes from the great psychiatrist and
student of Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, who disagreed with Freud’s skeptical atheism. What Jung observed in his own study of human
minds and emotions, is that people are ‘loose ends’ of feelings and commitments,
without a calling, command, or loyalty to the mysterious truth of God, who is
more than their individual selves ( See Interpreter’s
Dictionary of Bible, Genesis, p. 608, and C.G. Jung, Modern Man in Search of a
Soul (Brace & Co., 1933, p. ).
BUT
YOUR NAME SHALL BE….
Perhaps the most important part of
Abraham’s life, was that after God called and commanded him, he did not live
his life trying to live up to his own name, but as Abraham he lived his life
toward the promise in the name God gave him.
There really isn’t that much difference in this name, Abram, or Abraham,
in its spelling; but there is all the difference in the world the meaning;
between living your life only for yourself, or living your life for the God who
has called you by name to be more than you can be alone. Living toward God’s promise is what makes Abraham’s
story for us too. As Christians, we are also
a people given a ‘new name’ when we are baptized ‘in the name of Jesus Christ (Acts. 2:38).” This is what the Apostle Paul meant on two
occasions, once when he asked: ‘Don't
you realize that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit, who lives in you
and was given to you by God? You do not belong to yourself, for God bought you
with a high price. So you must honor God with your body” (1 Cor. 6:19-20 NLT). In the very next chapter of this first
letter to the Corinthians, he repeats this calling and command, making it even
clearer that God commands your life, not to take it from you, but to give it
back to you on better terms: “God paid a high
price for you, so don't be enslaved by the world” (1 Cor. 7:23 NLT).
At the heart of good psychology,
philosophy, and good theology too, going all the way back to Abrahamic faith,
the kind of ‘name’ you live up to determines
your life (There are even studies going on today to prove our name can impact
behavior, http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/why-your-name-matters).
In Christian terms, the name you are given by
God in Jesus Christ, (which used to be the name given at Christian Baptism),
symbolizes the power only God can give which he promises to redeem us from sin,
death and destruction. But you have to
let God give you his name. You must not
only believe on his name, but you must also live in his name, “in Christ” (Rom. 8:10; 12:4, 1 Cor.
1:2, 30, Eph 2:10, , Col. 1:27), Paul says over and over. You must determine to live our lives by this
‘name that is above every other name,… (Phil.
2: 5-11). It is this ‘name’ that saves us by giving us a
new name (Isa. 62: 2; Rev. 2:17, 3:12).
I
WILL MAKE YOU FRUITFUL….
There is an old story about two young
brothers who were caught stealing sheep. The punishment back then was to brand
the thief's forehead with the letters S.T., which stood for sheep thief. One
brother subsequently left the village and spent his remaining years wandering
from place to place indelibly marked by disgrace. The other remained in the
village, made restitution for the stolen sheep, and became a caring friend and
neighbor to the townspeople -- an old man loved by all. Many years later, a
stranger came to town and inquired about the S.T. on the old man's forehead.
"I'm not sure what it means," another told him. " It happened so
long ago, but I think the letters must stand for saint." God has a myriad
of other names to describe his beloved children, but his favorites are names
that describe a person who fulfills his purpose after he gets a name change (From a
sermon by Paul Kummer, From This Day Forward, CSS Publishing, This and the final
three stories also come from his sermon).
It was this ‘new’ name that was given to Abram that put God’s promise on
continual display. As Abraham submitted
to his new name, he was given promises, not just passively, but actively,
because they commanded and expected Abraham’s participation in the promise: “This
is my covenant with you (v.
4); I will make you the father of
nations….(v. 4), I will make you
fruitful….(v. 6),… I will give you
a land,… (v. 8),… I will be your God (v. 8). The
whole idea of promise was not just a promise that God made, but a promise that
Abraham also made to live into and toward the promises of God.
After all these promises were made to
Abraham, God said to him: “Your
responsibility is to obey the terms of the covenant. You and all your
descendants have this continual responsibility (Gen. 17:9 NLT). The outward sign of Abraham’s willingness to
live up to his responsibility of the covenant was ‘circumcision’. In the New
Testament, as a very Jewish Christianity became a world movement, was only
a spiritual form of circumcision that was required; a ‘circumcision of the heart’ (Rom. 2:29), which has always been ‘faith’ (Rom. 4:11ff). To receive the promises of God today, as it
was then, what matters most is what happens in the human heart, as a person decides
to live life ‘by faith’, not only by sight (Heb. 11:1ff). This means that we come to understand that
our own life is given to us as a ‘trust’ between us and our creator, who also
promises to be our redeemer with hope, through Jesus Christ. Now, since we receive the fullness of God’s
promises through the name of Jesus, we are called to live up to the ‘name’ we’ve been given ‘in him’ (2 Thess. 1:12, 3:6).
How well are we living up to the name
God gave us: Christian? Once, when Alexander the Great was reviewing his troops
, he walked along the straight lines, he found one scruffy, untidy, disheveled
soldier. Standing directly in front of the soldier, he barked at him and said, 'What is your name, private?
"Alexander, sir!" came the reply.
Staring even more sternly at him, the
Emperor asked again, "What is your
name?"
Again the soldier said, "Alexander, sir!"
Without hesitation, the Commander in Chief
once again asked him, "Private, I
said, what is your name?" Bewildered, the soldier meekly said, "Alexander, sir!"
The leader then replied, "Well, private, either change your conduct or
change your name!"
In another famous story, Francis of
Assisi invited a young monk to join him on a trip to town to preach. Honored to
be asked, the monk gladly accepted. All day long he and Francis walked through
the streets, alleyways, the byways, and even the suburbs. They saw and
interacted with hundreds of people. At day's end, the two headed back home. Not
even once had Francis addressed a crowd, nor had he specifically talked to
anyone about Jesus. His young companion was deeply disappointed and confused.
"I thought we were going into town to preach." Francis replied,
"My son, we have preached. We were preaching while we were walking. We
were seen by many and our behavior was closely watched. It is of no use to walk
anywhere to preach unless we preach everywhere as we walk!"
As we walk with Christ today, just as
Abraham also walked with God by faith, we also live toward God’s promises, as we
live our lives ‘in Jesus name’. And it
is not just by words that we live, but it is also by deeds. As Jesus said, “Many say Lord, have we not preached in your name….”, but “I
never knew (them)’ (Matt. 7:22). A
life lived in Jesus’ name, must be more than words, but also deeds. A final story told from World War II, is
about a church in Strasbourg, France, was destroyed and little remained, but
rubble. When that was cleared, a statue of Christ, standing erect, was found.
It was unbroken except for the two hands, which were missing. In time, the
church was rebuilt. A sculptor, noticing the missing hands on the statue of
Christ, said, "Let me carve a new statue of Christ, with hands."
Church officials met to consider the sculptor's proposal. His offer was
rejected. A spokesman for the church said, "Our
broken statue will serve to remind us that Christ touches the hearts of men,
but he has not a hand to minister to the needy or feed the hungry or enrich the
poor except our hands."
This is the calling of Christians
(little Christs) and saints: to be the hands and feet of Jesus in this world. This
is what is meant by bearing ‘the fruit of
the Spirit’ of Jesus (Gal. 2:22), so that we live by his good name (Acts 10:38) and so we can keep
ours (Phil 4:8; 1 Tim 3:7). It was this
same kind of calling that Abraham and Sarah had, and it is why God called
Jacob, Saul, and Peter by new names. To
answer this calling for us today is to declare with Paul and Peter that in our
lives, there is ‘no other name by which
we must be saved’ (Acts 4:12) because we have found our life in his name (John 10:10). Do you
have the promise of this name? Amen.
No comments :
Post a Comment