A
sermon based upon Luke 2: 1-20
By
Rev. Dr. Charles J. Tomlin, BA, MDiv, DMin.
Flat
Rock-Zion Baptist Partnership,
Sunday,
Dec. 13th,, 2020 Christmas in Quartet: 4 Part-Harmony of the
Christmas Story
Who
doesn’t love the Christmas story. My
wife’s family tradition was that on Christmas Eve, for her Father’s side of the
family to gather at her grandparents home, and before sharing gifts, her
grandmother would read, very emotionally, the Christmas story from Luke. Fortunately, after we were married, I also
got to participate in that tradition.
I’m
sure each of you have developed some Christmas traditions too. If your tradition is religious, it probably focuses
somehow on this story from Luke, which is the only gospel that tells us that
Jesus was ‘wrapped in swaddling clothes and laid in a manager’.
While
Matthew also tells us where Jesus was born; in Bethlehem and not in his
hometown of Nazareth, only Luke tells us ‘how’ he was born, in such a inconvenient,
unexpected, and humiliating setting.
With
this little introduction, we continue the current Advent series entitled,,
“Christmas In Quartet. We’re studying
how and why the Christmas story differs in each gospel.
In
our first message, we noted how Mark sings lead; the main melody line about
Jesus takes us straight to the cross. Then, last week we heard Matthew’s more dissonant
voice pointing to the Jewish world, where the message of Christmas is grounded.
Today,
we come to Luke’s familiar, well known, and most beloved voice. As a historian and man of the world, Luke focused
on many detail to point out the universal implications of Jesus’ birth and
story.
TO
WRITE AN ORDERLY ACCOUNT. Luke 1:3,
Luke’s
attention to details can be compared to how Laura Hillenbrand wrote the
biography of Louis Zamperini. Zamperini
was Olympian and war hero, who was converted at a Billy Graham crusade.
Hillenbrand
also wrote the book Sea-biscuit. Critics
have called Hillenbrand a “research genius” and one of the “best writers” alive
today.
To
write her account of Zamperini’s life, she conducted 75 interviews and pored
over countless historical documents, taking 7 years to write “Unbroken,” the
496-page biography of Zamperini’s life.
In
Luke’s own approach to the gospel, it looks as if he has researched the life of
the Lord Jesus quite extensively too.
He seems to writing this gospel account to intentionally speak to a much
broader audience.
Luke
may have interviewed eyewitnesses and pulled together other source material. As a physician, he was careful, thoughtful,
and persuasive. In the way he crafted his
gospel together, you can tell that he
was accustomed to handling data and giving close attention to details This is why in opening verses, he says he made
an ‘orderly account’.
But
what does this mean, an ‘orderly account’.
How this relate to Luke’s whole approach to the Christmas story?
Well,
for one thing, Luke’s gospel is the longest gospel. Luke wrote Acts too. Luke’s goal seems to be to take us from the
‘humble beginnings’ of Jesus, and to how the church was also born and launched out
into the world. Luke would have been
especially interested in this story, as he was a companion to Paul on some of
his missionary journeys (2 Tim. 4:11, Col 4.14).
This
makes it clear, that Luke’s gospel certainly has missionary concerns. You can see this missionary concern bleed
through the pages in two most prominent ways.
One, Luke is writing this account for Theophilus (Luke 1:3, Acts 1:1). This is either a real person with Greek name which
means ‘friend of God’ or, most likely, it could be a pseudonym for
his intended audience; a culturally Greek people who were open to Jewish,
religious ideas and the story of Jesus.
Also,
Luke’s primary aim was to tell the story, not in contrast to the evil ways of the
Jewish King Herod, but to point to Jesus, as opposed to the cruel, corrupted rulers
of the Roman Empire. Just as those
rulers were considered to be divine ‘sons of God’, Luke even more
intentionally, points to Jesus as the humble, but true ‘Son of God’.
In
this his gospel, Luke is putting forth a missionary invitation to the saving,
healing, and more compassionate way of Jesus Christ. His perspective of the gospel, and Christmas
too, has striking, universal and political implications, as we are about to
see.
ON
EARTH, PEACE... 2:13
We
see Luke’s world-shaking and world-shaping very ‘political’ and ‘missionary’ gospel
in the most climatic introduction to Jesus, at the close of the account, when
the angels announce his birth to ‘shepherds’ who were ‘keeping watch
over their flocks by night’ (2:8).
Here,
we not only have an angel, like in Matthew, but Luke’s announcement concludes
with a ‘multitude of the heavenly host’ proclaiming in chorus, ‘Glory
to God in the highest, and on earth peace...’ (2:14).
So,
the very first political question raises with his readers it this: How does Jesus birth and life offer the peace
‘on earth’, when the earth we live on can be such a troubled, conflicted
and war-threatened place?
Interestingly,
that very question was once asked in a Christmas carol, based upon a poem by
Henry Wadsworth Longfellow in 1863. That
poem was written in a time our greatest American conflict, during the middle of
America’s Civil War. If you recall, it
was Longfellow who also wrote the famous poem about ‘The midnight Ride of Paul
Revere’.
The
Christmas Carol tells of the writer’s despair upon hearing Christmas bells
during the American Civil War, saying "hate is strong and mocks the
song of peace on earth, good will to men". Here, Longfellow quotes Luke 2:14
directly.
The
song does not end with despair, but concludes with the bells carrying a message
of renewed hope for peace among people, saying, in spite of what was happening
at the time, that: "God is not dead, nor doth He sleep; The Wrong shall
fail, The Right prevail, With peace on earth, good-will to men."
In
1861, two years before writing this poem, Longfellow's personal peace was
shaken when his second wife of 18 years, to whom he was very devoted, was
fatally burned in an accidental fire.
Then
in 1863, during the American Civil War, Longfellow's oldest son, Charles
Appleton Longfellow, joined the Union Army without his father's blessing.
Longfellow
was informed by a letter dated March 14, 1863, after Charles had left. "I
have tried hard to resist the temptation of going without your leave but I
cannot any longer", he wrote. "I feel it to be my first duty
to do what I can for my country and I would willingly lay down my life for it
if it would be of any good.".
Charles
was soon appointed as a lieutenant but, at the end of November that same year,
he was severely wounded during General Mede’s failed Mine Run Campaign against
General Lee in northern Virginia.
Charles
eventually recovered from his shoulder wound, but his time as a soldier was
finished. Longfellow wrote the poem on
Christmas Day in 1863, right after he received a Telegram informing him that his
son had been wounded in battle.
What
makes this poem and song so powerful, is that is so honestly hopeful. It faces the realities of life in a conflicted
world but does this with unrelenting hope in God’s promise of peace.
I
recall another Christmas Carol story based upon “It Came Upon a Midnight
Clear”. “Midnight Clear” is a historically
accurate 1992 World War II movie based upon the true story of how American and
German soldiers faced each other in the Ardennes Forest, just before the Battle
of the Bulge.
It was near the end of the war, and the German
patrol actually wanted to surrender without their superiors knowing about it. They
called a cease fire and met with American’s to exchange cigarettes and sing
Christmas carols. The next day, their
common plan for the Germans to surrender tragically did not work, but for one
moment, on cold winter night, there had been ‘peace’, but peace didn’t work
out.
Unfortunately,
as we in the church know all too well, in our world, whether it be personal or
political, even God’s peace doesn’t always work out either. “Hate is still very strong, and still
mocks the song of Peace”. So, how
are we to understand Luke’s angelic greeting?
Is this only a hopeful greeting, or is it an unattainable spiritual
reality, or is it, as most might say, wishful thinking of a delusional
religious mythology?
He
has Lifted Up the Lowly 1:52
Luke’s
own answer, which maybe is the kind of answer most don’t want to hear, is that
a brand-new kind of ‘politic’ that has entered into the world through Jesus
Christ.
The
new political agenda of Jesus is made clear by the angel Gabriel, who comes to
Mary. Gabriel isn’t just any angel. Gabriel is Israel’s guardian angel and God’s
ruling angel, who will do whatever is needed to defend Israel from other
nations.
It
is Gabriel who not only says that Mary ‘will conceive’, but Gabriel
announces that Mary’s child will be ‘great’, the Son of the Most High,
and that the Lord God will give to him the throne of his ancestor David’
(1:32). That’s not a simple ‘post card’
greeting. The angel Gabriel means
business, and it’s political business too, and it doesn’t stop there. Later on in this text, Mary visits her
sister-in-law, Elizabeth. After
informing her about the child, Mary breaks out in a song of praise to God that
has more political punch than anything else in Luke’s gospel.
Are
ready for it? Mary is full of praise
because through the birth of her child,
‘The Mighty One’ (she names God) has not only ‘scattered the
proud’, but this God has ‘brought down the powerful from their thrones,
and lifted up the lowly’. This
God ‘has filled the hungry with good things, and has ‘sent the rich
away empty.’ It is because of this political agenda that
God has ‘helped his servant Israel’ and ‘remembered mercy’. God is about to something political,
earth-shaking again, because in order to lift one people up, God will have to
bring others down. Do you see that?
Often,
we hear pastor’s being warned, ‘’When you work in your church, make sure you
don’t get political.’ And there certainly
some important wisdom being shared here, isn’t there? As a
pastor, or even as a church, you don’t want to get locked into one side of the
political equation in our country, or any country for that matter. The gospel is bigger than one political
party. The gospel is also bigger than
any one nation too.
I
once told you about the Baptist pastor in Texas, who upon being convinced that
the Mennonites and Amish are right not to put any national flag on display, he proceeded
to remove the America flag from the pulpit area, without consulting church
leaders. Upon finding the flag removed,
the next week they removed the pastor, and then on the following week the
America flag was back up. Today, that
pastor now leads a Mennonite church in Virginia.
Yes,
we must use wisdom in understanding the connection between God and any nation;
and just as God is pro-Israel, pro-America, he is must also be understood to be
pro-people, period too. But when we
read the Christmas, we must understand that the church must have a political
agenda. The word ‘politic’ means ‘of the
people’ and if we are going to be a church who cares about God’s agenda, then we must know that we aren’t only given a
spiritual agenda, but we have a political one too.
And
one of the of the most important images that reveals Jesus’ own political agenda,
which is God’s own political agenda, is being detailed for us in Luke more than
any other gospel. And this political
agenda is that God is constantly inviting new people to God’s table of goodness
and grace.
After
Mary tells us that God ‘has filled the hungry with good things’, we also see Jesus as a dinner guest with a
sinner, tax collector (5:27f), a Pharisee (7:36f.), at the home of Martha and
Mary, (10: 38f.), and then, he is eating at the house of a Pharisee again,
where he does not ‘wash his hands’ in the proper ritualistic fashion
(11:37f.).
Jesus
is also invited to a Sabbath meal with a ‘ruler of the Pharisees’ (14:
1f). The point is Jesus is always at a
‘table’ eating somewhere, and he is normally the kind of dinner guest you
wouldn’t invite, unless you are also prepared for some kind of trouble.
And
the biggest trouble with Jesus, according to Luke, is that Jesus has such bad
‘table manners’, that he and his own ministry was labeled as ‘the one who
welcomes and eats with sinners’ (Luke 15:1ff).
In
fact, more than anything else, Luke wants us to know that it is Jesus’ own
table manners, especially in how he spoke about the rich man’ went to Hell, was
the one who has all kinds of wealth and food, but he didn’t have God. The reason he didn’t have God, wasn’t because
he didn’t believe in God, but because he never stopped to see or meet the need
of the poor beggar, who was lying helpless, hopeless and hungry right out his
is front door.
Now,
are you beginning to see the kind of political agenda Jesus has in Luke,
especially? Other gospels reveal this
political agenda too. In fact, Matthew
even has Jesus saying plainly, that ‘he didn’t come to bring peace, but a
sword’ (10:34). Luke didn’t even go that
far. But Luke accomplishes the same
challenging political agenda with ‘forks and knifes’.
For
you see, Jesus does have a political agenda---a very definite political agenda,
but Jesus is not on the side of Democrats or Republicans. Jesus
is on the side of the poor and those who have needs, ever which party that is
at any given time. And Jesus displayed
his agenda with who he ate with, and how he challenged people with means reach
out and respond to help those without means, especially in the basic matters of
food and community. It was actually
because Jesus was so politically charged, not only religiously charged, that
the religious and the political establishment felt like they had to get rid of
him.
I
know this is not the kind of stuff you want to hear about at Christmas.
You
mind is already on some other agenda---you family agendas that are so important
to all of us this time of year. I
understand that. That’s certainly
important too.
Still,
we must also consider the true political agenda of Jesus, which goes hand in
hand with his spiritual, saving agenda too. For Israel, and for us too, still today, ‘Salvation’ isn’t just a religious matter,
it’s also a political matter. Salvation
isn’t just something God wants to do in people spiritually, but salvation,
which means, ‘healing’, also has a family, community, social, and political
agenda too.
And
isn’t it true, that we often do, perhaps more than churches used too, don’t we think
this political and social agenda more this time of year? Don’t we have ministry programs, and give
money to charity now, at Christmastime, more than other times? Maybe, just maybe, we’ve already have a
glimpse at seeing that Jesus and his agenda is bigger than just going to church. Maybe we might even see that Jesus is bigger
than going to heaven too. Of course, I’m
certainly not belittling going to church or going to heaven, but what I am
doing is helping us see that Jesus cares about much about this world as the
next. In fact, the Bible actually
teaches Resurrection, not mere immortality.
In other words, the Bible cares about what happens in this world,
because God’s future, in some amazing, transformational way, includes this
world, as part of the world that is still to come. Yes, the world must still undergo some
tremendous changes, but God’s world is it is heaven. Isn’t that how Jesus taught us to pray; ‘Thy Will be done on earth, as it is in
heaven?’
Luke
is the one who brings right out in the open, and applies it not just to
Jerusalem, or Israel but puts Israel right in the middles of the greater political
struggle that is still going on in the world; the struggle between the rich and
the poor, the struggle between the powerful and weak, which is just as
important, as the struggle between the proud and the humble. In fact, it is Luke’s Jesus who said, the
Kingdom is here, now, ‘among’ you (17:21).
Because
You Did Not Believe 1:20
Finally,
here again, this hope of a changed peaceable world, because of a changed more
peaceable people; people who not only care about God and what we can get from
God, but who actually care about those who need us to care about them, and what
we can ‘give’ to them. This is a
‘kingdom’, that never comes, but which the angels announced, and Jesus declared
is a kingdom that can be ‘among’ us, even here and now, if we care enough.
Maria
Colvin, a British war reporter, was killed in 2012, while covering the heart-breaking
civil war in Syria, where President Assad, sent out jets to bomb his own
people. She was reporting on how it
wasn’t armies he was attacking, but families, women, children, and the
elderly. That was her approach in many
places she had gone before, in Libya, in Iran, in Afghanistan, and in
Bangladesh, reporting in the darkest corners of war torn areas, about what
happens to normal people to bright light upon the true human costs of war. Before he tragic death, she asked why she choose
to do such dangerous work. She said: ‘I
cared enough to go to these places and write in some way something that would
make someone else care as much about it as I did at the time. Part of doing this is that you're never going
to get to where you're going if you acknowledge fear. I think fear comes later
when you've - when it's all over.’
We
all know the world and people, need to change; to do things differently. But what will it take for that to
happen? What will it take for peace to
come to the world that lasts? What will
take for a political agenda to rise up that makes a real, lasting change to how
we live together in this world, and how we come together in this world, as
rich, poor, powerful, weak, or proud and humble? How will that ever happen?
The
answer is in how Luke opens up his gospel, with the very strange story about a
Priest, named Zechariah, who is also visited by an angel. He’s an old man, and his wife too, are both
too old to have children. In a
surprising, and frightening visit, an angel informs Zechariah that this is going
to happen. But when Zechariah hears
this, he asks the wrong question.
“How?” Old Zech is a old Priest,
and he’s been righteous and faithful too, but this didn’t set too well with the
angel. The angel makes him mute, until
the Baby is born, just to prove his point.
And
do you know why Luke tells us that the angel was so hard on Zechariah? The angel explains, “... because you did
not believe my words, which will be fulfilled in their time, you will
become mute, unable to speak, until the day these things occur." (Lk.
1:20 NRS)
Did
you catch the problem the angel has with this very religious guy? This guy who believes in God. This guy who goes to church every Sunday, or
Saturday. This guy who has been faithful
to God every day of his life? Do you
know why the angel is so hard on him? He
doesn’t believe.
Oh,
yes, Zechariah believes in God, he just doesn’t believe God wants to do
something different. Zechariah has
gotten stuck in the ‘same ole, same ole’.
He wasn’t ready to see and understand that God is about to do something
different, very different.
My
favorite part of the story about Zechariah, comes at the end, when Elizabeth’s
baby is born, and people start wondering, what she’s going to name the
baby. She said his name was going to be
‘John’, as the angel had instructed her.
The neighbor’s answer, but nobody in your family has that name. So they went to Zechariah, who still can’t
speak, and they ask him what the child’s name will be. They had him a tablet to write on. And do you know what Zechariah writes? He writes exactly what the angel said:
“JOHN”. It was then, that Zechariah
regained his voice.
What
about you? The reason hate is still strong
and mocks the song of peace on earth’ isn’t because of what God hasn’t
done. No, everything that needs to be
done, needs to be said, and needs to be proven, so that we can get life right,
get our heads right, and get our politics right, has been done, but do we get
it?
Are
we ready for God to do something different?
Don’t we know enough about what war, hate, and divisive, dirty,
underhanded politics does to people, and will finally do to us? How can we, in this season of the year, or
any season, do something that makes a difference and brings peace and hope to
those hurting and hungry for love around us?
Amen.